Legal Opinion
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Idaho Trout Processors Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1974No. 72-2415PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal concerns § 13(a)(6) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. § 213(a) (6)), the provision which exempts employers of “employees employed in agriculture” from the wage and hour requirements of the Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 206 and 207). More specifically, the question is whether the district court erred in determining that employees of Idaho Trout Processors Company (Trout Processors) were within the purview of the Act and hence Trout Processors was liable to them for back pay.
Trout Processors was incorporated in 1959 under the laws of Idaho, as a nonexempt cooperative…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dofflemyer v. National Labor Relations Board. National Labor Relations Board v. DofflemyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
4Cited by6 opinions
- Jose Ageo Luna Vanegas v. Signet Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Roebuck v. Hudson Valley Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Simeon Manriquez v. Manuel Diaz FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Tullous v. Texas Aquaculture Processing Co. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.