Legal Opinion
Santa Cruz Oil Corp. v. Milnor
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1942No. Civ. 12022PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
Appellants—plaintiffs in the court below— brought suit to enjoin defendants, members of the Fish and Game Commission, from enforcing against them the provisions of section 1110 of the Fish and Game Code of this state (Stats. 1939, p. CXXXIX; Initiative Measures approved Nov. 8, 1939), urging among other contentions that said section is violative of the state Constitution in that upon its submission to the voters it lacked the required legislative title. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained. Plaintiffs electing to stand upon their pleading, declined to amend. Judgment for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. BundrantAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Hjelle v. BrooksDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1974
- Tinsley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Adams v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.