Legal Opinion

American Investment Co. v. Farrar

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 30, 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Hancock District Court. — Hon. John C. Sherwin, Jndge. Action in equity for the foreclosure of a mortgage on real estate. A receiver of the mortgaged premises was appointed in vacation, a motion for his discharge was afterwards made and sustained, and from the order sustaining the motion the plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

— On the twentieth day of August, 1885, the defendants, Georgiana Way and C. C. Way, made to P. 0. Refsell their promissory note for the sum of six thousand dollars due on the first day of January, 1891, with eleven interest coupons thereto attached, which provided for the payment of semiannual interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum from the date of ■the note. To secure the payment of the note and •coupons, the defendants named executed to E. S. Ormsby, as trustee, a mortgage upon the premises in controversy, situated in Hancock county, which was *438thereafter duly recorded. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myton v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Des Moines Gas Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Paine v. McElroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. White v. GriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. State v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Young v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Norfor v. BusbyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sayre v. Vander VoortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Starits v. AverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Johnson v. SiedelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API