Netahla v. Netahla
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beier, J.:
This appeal arises out of a dispute over whether the mineral interest conveyed by a 1970 mineral deed terminated after 15 years, despite its recitation that it was “subject to” a continuing oil and gas lease covering the same property. We hold that the mineral deed terminated and thus reverse the district court and the Court of Appeals.
Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiffs-appellants Larry Netahla and Janet Netahla Curtis are the sole heirs of Joe and Rose Netahla, the grantors. Defendants-appellees Mike Netahla and Debra Francis are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dula Dashiell Cockrell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
- Kokernot v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Englestien v. MintzIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Hoffman v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. PeersIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KnoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Central Kansas Medical Center v. HatesohlSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Oxy USA, Inc. v. Red Wing Oil, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- Central Kansas Medical Center v. HatesohlSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Media One Communications LLC v. MacAtawa Bank CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.