Legal Opinion

Cerealine Manufacturing Co. v. Bickford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1891No. 14,697PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J. —

The appellees sued the appellant on account. Answer that the goods were warranted, and that there had been a breach of the warranty ; also a paragraph of counterclaim was filed by the appellant against the appellees, counting upon the breach of warranty, and asking an affirmative judgment for a large sum.

The action was commenced August 23d, 1887, and, having been regularly set for trial at the May term, 1888, was continued, on affidavit and motion filed by the appellant, on account of the absence of Joseph F. Gent. On the 1st day of October, 1888, the appellant applied for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Breedlove v. BundyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Peck v. ParchenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Boone v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gregory v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Way v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. City of Huntington v. FolkIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kleinrichert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API