Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Amrine

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 25, 1941No. 35,244PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DawsoN, C. J.:

Petitioner asks his release from the custody of the warden of the penitentiary, urging matters on our attention of which judicial cognizance could only have been taken if a timely appeal had been presented. Habeas corpus is not a substitute for an appeal.

We have, however, permitted this application and its accompanying documents to be filed without deposit for costs, and have read *437them carefully. Excusing his defective pleadings and conclusions, which are quite obvious, the record he presents makes it altogether clear that nothing is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Levell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Cochran v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Glover v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Glover v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Levell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Kneisley v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. Powers v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Elliott v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Moody v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API