Legal Opinion

American Optometric Ass'n v. Ritholz

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 10, 1939No. 6615PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TREANOR, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee brought this suit in the District Court to enjoin defendants, appellants here, from prosecuting allegedly vexatious actions at law and suits in equi ty. The prayer was for an injunction and general relief. The trial court made findings of fact supporting substantially all the allegations of the complaint and entered a perpetual injunction against the defendants and rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against defendants for damages in the sum of $4,000. The defendants-appellants have appealed from the order of injunction and the judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Smith v. AppleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. MunchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. DASA Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  4. Trustees of Schools of Township 42 North v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. 600 California Corporation v. Harjean Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API