Legal Opinion

Redding v. Thomas

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 23, 2015No. Civil No. 12-1041 (DSD/LIB)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the pro se motion by petitioner Lawrence Christopher Redding for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) and the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court denies the motion.

BACKGROUND

On November 12, 1992, a jury convicted Redding of three counts of felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e)(1). At sentencing, the court determined that Redding was subject to the Armed Career Criminal Act…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. John R. Tiedeman v. Dennis Benson, Warden, State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Leal Garcia v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API