Legal Opinion

Sitkin Converting, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1974No. Appeal, No. 233 C.D. 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Charles F. Hollenbaugh had been employed by SitIdn Converting, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Sitldn), as a machine operator for approximately two years. On October 6, 1970, Hollenbaugh refused an order from his foreman to sweep the floor. The next morning he was told that he had been given a day off as a result of this indiscretion. Hollenbaugh then left work and did not return thereafter.

Hollenbaugh’s application for unemployment compensation benefits was denied by the Bureau of Employment Security on the ground that his termination was due to his wilful misconduct.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shira v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Kernisky v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Hambridge Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rabago v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Feltman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. BeyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API