Legal Opinion

World Species List — Natural Features Registry Institute v. Reading

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 29, 2009No. 08-P-282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.

A judge of the Land Court entered a summary judgment declaring that easement language was in essence a view easement that permits the defendants to cut vegetation in order to maintain their view. The plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Background. The original plaintiff, Richard Stafursky, is the founder and president of World Species List — Natural Features *303Registry Institute (World Species). World Species was substituted for Stafursky as plaintiff in this action, which in essence sought (1) a judgment declaring the meaning of an appurtenant easement originating in a deed from which the defendants,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. M.P.M. Builders, LLC v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Ladd v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noonan v. Wonderland Greyhound Park Realty LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  2. Hollfelder Living Trust Dated December 6, 2012 v. American Transmission Company LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2026
  3. Skye v. HessionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API