Legal Opinion

Gittlin v. Slovinac

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1928No. Appeal 13PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This action was begun before a magistrate for the recovery of rent for two months on a lease, in writing between the plaintiff, lessor, and the defendant, lessee, dated September 4, 1.924, for a term of five years, beginning October 1,1924, at a rental of $35 a month for the first year, and $40 a month for the second year and balance of term, payable monthly in advance. The lease contained a provision that any removal or attempt to remove from premises should be deemed a fraudulent and clandestine removal, and the whole rent for the entire term should thereupon fall…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ray v. West. Penna. N. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Wills v. Manufacturers N. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Deihm v. SnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Cochran v. PewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Bartley v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bauman v. BittnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Moretti v. Zanfino Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Eshleman v. Mumper, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1950
  4. Rose v. Eicher, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1954
  5. Rzasa v. JaroszSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API