Legal Opinion

In Re Richards

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1999No. 24,472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

{1} Pursuant to the Rules Governing Discipline, 17-101 to -316 NMRA 1999, this matter came before this Court for consideration of the disciplinary board’s findings; conclusions, and recommendations for discipline. The disciplinary proceeding which is the subject of this appeal involves two frivolous claims that Robert Richards (“Respondent”) filed. 1 The disciplinary board found that Respondent’s conduct resulted in the violation of Rule 16-301, which prohibits the assertion of frivolous claims, and several other provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct Rules, Rule 16-101 to…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Garcia v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Rich v. BraxtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Gould v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Leyba v. WhitleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In the Matter of Michele EstradaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Stansell v. New Mexico LotteryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Robertson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API