In Re Richards
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
{1} Pursuant to the Rules Governing Discipline, 17-101 to -316 NMRA 1999, this matter came before this Court for consideration of the disciplinary board’s findings; conclusions, and recommendations for discipline. The disciplinary proceeding which is the subject of this appeal involves two frivolous claims that Robert Richards (“Respondent”) filed. 1 The disciplinary board found that Respondent’s conduct resulted in the violation of Rule 16-301, which prohibits the assertion of frivolous claims, and several other provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct Rules, Rule 16-101 to…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Skip Kirchdorfer, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Garcia v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Rich v. BraxtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gould v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Leyba v. WhitleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- In the Matter of Michele EstradaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Stansell v. New Mexico LotteryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Robertson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005