Legal Opinion

Skinner v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Indictment for selling liquor. Before Judge Janes. Douglas superior court. December 8, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

1. The rule relating to the distinction between positive and negative evidence does not apply and should not be given in charge to a jury, when there are two witnesses having equal facilities for seeing or hearing the thing about which they testify, and, directly contradicting each other, one of them testifies that it occurred and the other that it did not. Civil Code, § 5165, and cases there cited. See also Killian v. Ga. R. R. Co., 97 Ga. 728; Humphries v. State, 100 Ga. 200.

2.- The charge upon this rule, to which exception is taken in the present case, was unwarranted. Judgment reversed.

All…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conley v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Peak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Great American Indemnity Co. v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API