Legal Opinion

Snedker v. Baltimore Brick Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 5, 1951No. [No. 33, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for the appellee for costs, in an action to recover broker’s commissions of $2,057.11, tried by the court without a jury. The appellant poses two questions, whether he was the procuring cause of the sales in question, and whether his authority and agency had terminated prior to the sales.

There is little dispute as to the facts. The Baltimore Brick Company, in the course of its manufacturing operations, had acquired numerous parcels of “worked out” land which it was holding for sale, either directly or through brokers, but at no time under exclusive listing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  2. Hill v. IglehartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  3. Bond v. HumbirdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  4. Aler v. PlowmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Rogers v. GarriguesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steele v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Hogan v. QT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Burrell v. FrisbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Storch v. RickerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Binswanger Companies v. Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API