People v. Cuevas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From a judgment convicting him of having violated the statute which forbids any person to possess a narcotic (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500) except upon the written prescription of a person licensed to prescribe same, appellant brings his cause here for review. He maintains that the conclusion of the trial court is not justified by the evidence.
The Total Evidence
Defendant Cuevas had for about a year operated a hotel of 30 rooms in Los Angeles. Gregory Villalva was a guest, and had been so for three months prior to the events here related. He worked in the daytime. On the day of his arrest, he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Daeche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- De Gregorio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ParisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. HoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. BagleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. LeyvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.