Legal Opinion

Charles M. Coleman v. Sherwood Medical Industries

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 15, 1984No. 84-1867PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

The issue before us is whether Sherwood Medical Industries may appeal from a dis trict court’s 1 order requiring it to pay Charles M. Coleman $500 in attorneys’ fees and $441.68 in costs as a sanction for failing to comply with a discovery order. We conclude that it may not, and therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

On February 1, 1984 plaintiff/appellee Charles M. Coleman obtained an order requiring defendant/appellant Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc. to submit to a deposition and to produce certain documents. On March 30, 1984, Coleman filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. FinesilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Appeal of Licht & SemonoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Rhonda Tenkku v. Normandy Bank - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. Yamaner v. OrkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Reed v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Alexander v. National Farmers OrganizationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API