Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1908No. 15,244PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: William A. Redick, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Fawcett, O.

Plaintiff sued in the district court for Douglas county to recover a balance alleged to be due for the construction of artificial stone sidewalks in the city of Omaha, such balance being represented by what is termed “special fund warrants” issued by the city to the contractors who laid the walks. The walks were laid under three semi-annual contracts, covering the periods of time from January 1 to June 1, 1893, from June 1, 189.3, to January 1, 1894, and from June 1 to January 1, 1895, and one annual contract running from December 31, 1896, to December 31, 1897. Plaintiff had…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Ft. Dodge Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Ft. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Pimental v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Austin Bros. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Warren v. County of StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Henning v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. J. H. Tillman Co. v. City of SeasideOregon Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API