Legal Opinion

Richter v. East St. Louis & S. Ry. Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 23, 1927No. 7655PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARIS» District Judge.

Defendant demurs, for that (a) this action cannot be maintained in this court by the administrator under the law of Missouri, as applied to the facts set out in the petition; and (b) because the facts pleaded are not sufficient to constitute any cause of action against defendant.

These facts are few and simple. Plaintiff’s decedent, a resident and citizen of Missouri in her lifetime, was killed in the state of Illinois, as it is said, by the negligence of the defendant’s servants, employees and agents. Plaintiff was duly appointed administrator of her estate in Missouri,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. ReddinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Bengtson v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1955
  4. State v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API