Legal Opinion

Jose Manuel Quijada Gaxiola v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1973No. 72-2319PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS, BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges. ELY, Circuit Judge:

Gaxiola was convicted after pleading guilty to the charge of importing marijuana without paying a tax required un der 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a). He contends 1 that he should be afforded an opportunity to plead anew because (1) he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to claim the privilege against self-incrimination as a complete defense to the marijuana tax charge since that right was not established until one year after his plea was entered (Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L. Ed.2d 57…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. William Sams Appeal of Victor CarlucciCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Ronald Lynn Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. John Dececco, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. UlanoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1979
  5. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API