Legal Opinion
S.M. v. State
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided May 30, 2014No. 20140199-CAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Decision
2Per curiam
T1 S.M. and KM. (Parents) appeal the juvenile court's February 21, 2013 order terminating their parental rights. We affirm.
12 Parents assert that the juvenile court erred by admitting records from the Department of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL), which identified their prescription drug use. The juvenile court *1222may consider any information that is relevant to the disposition of a child welfare case, including reliable hearsay and opinions. See In re J.F., 2014 Utah App 82, ¶ 6. In reviewing the admissibility of hearsay, legal conclusions are reviewed for correctness,…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Diversified Holdings, L.C. v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. A.C.M.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. C.D.L.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- D.M. v. S.H.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.