Hunt v. Ponder
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. “A petition showing a plaintiff and a defendant, and setting out sufficient to indicate and specify some particular fact or transaction as a cause of action, is enough to amend by. The jurisdiction of the court may be shown, and the details and circumstances of the particular transaction may be amplified and varied by amendment. If the declaration omit to allege facts essential to raise a duty or obligation involved in the cause of action which was evidently originally intended to be declared upon, the omitted fact may be supplied by amendment.” Civil Code (1910), § 5682.(a) “So long as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Florida Midland & Georgia Railroad v. VarnedoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Gunther Bros. v. AylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cheatham v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Cheatham v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Dixie Ornamental Iron Co. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955