Legal Opinion

Schmaltz v. McKissic

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided April 27, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00677Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL SCHMALTZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:19-cv-00677-AGF ) ALACIOUS MCKISSIC, et al., ) ) Defendants, ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on review of self-represented plaintiff Michael Schmaltz’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and for failure to state a claim. Legal Standard on Initial Review Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API