Legal Opinion

Hird v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant General Motors Corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 28, 1977, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their bill of particulars. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Although we are mindful of the liberal policy to be followed with respect to motions to amend (see CPLR 3025, subd [b]; Portilla v Boyke, 51 AD2d 539), we are of the opinion that under the facts of this case it was an improvident exercise of discretion, resulting in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James-Smith v. RottenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Portilla v. BoykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Liggieri v. PasternackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Schultz v. EllenbogenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. EnrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Roman v. BinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Giordano v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Hawes v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API