Smith v. Colorado Department of Human Services
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROY.
Plaintiff, Tanya Smith, appeals the judgment of the trial court upholding a decision of the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) in which plaintiff was held responsible for the balance of an overpayment of benefits paid to her mother during a period in which plaintiff was a dependent child in her mother’s home under the Ad to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. While we consider the result that a child is liable for the debt of a parent somewhat anomalous, we conclude that it is dictated by the applicable statutes and regulations and, therefore, affirm.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gamble v. Levitz Furniture Co. of the MidwestColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Orsinger Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Obert v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Quarterman v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Krol v. CF & I SteelColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Waneka v. ClynckeColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People ex rel. J.W.W.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- v. PellegrinColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.