Legal Opinion

Smith v. Colorado Department of Human Services

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1996No. 94CA2122PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

Plaintiff, Tanya Smith, appeals the judgment of the trial court upholding a decision of the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) in which plaintiff was held responsible for the balance of an overpayment of benefits paid to her mother during a period in which plaintiff was a dependent child in her mother’s home under the Ad to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. While we consider the result that a child is liable for the debt of a parent somewhat anomalous, we conclude that it is dictated by the applicable statutes and regulations and, therefore, affirm.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Levitz Furniture Co. of the MidwestColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Orsinger Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Obert v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Quarterman v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Krol v. CF & I SteelColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Waneka v. ClynckeColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People ex rel. J.W.W.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. v. PellegrinColorado Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API