Legal Opinion
Bibum v. Wilson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-1587Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARIE BIBUM, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23-1587 (JMC) v. SCOTT WILSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Marie Bibum, Mociana Corp., Inc., and State Pharmacy, Inc. do not state a viable claim that Defendant T.D. Bank, N.A (“T.D. Bank”) was negligent in verifying a cashier’s check. Accordingly, T.D. Bank’s motion to dismiss, ECF 11, is granted, and Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction is denied, ECF 16. 1 I. BACKGROUND The Court understands the following from Plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.