Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1985No. 18934Published

1ConcurrenceStewart, Justice

I do not agree with the majority’s reading of Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), and more importantly I do not agree that the scope of the search warrant can be expanded beyond its own language by the language in the underlying affidavit. Nevertheless, I concur in the result because I believe the search warrant was on its face sufficiently broad to allow a search of the fenced enclosure.

I

Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964), and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 89 S.Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), infuse the Fourth…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API