United States v. Harrison
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
On consideration of the entire record, we hold the findings of guilty and the sentence as approved by the convening authority correct in law and fact. Trial defense counsel submitted a request for clemency to the convening authority pursuant to Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rules for Courts-Martial [hereinafter R.C.M.] 1105 and 1106. The appellant now asserts error in the failure of the staff judge advocate (SJA) to comment thereon. Notwithstanding that trial defense counsel labelled his submission, in part, as being under R.C.M. 1105, because no…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. GhiglieriU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CoderU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. HigerdU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988