Legal Opinion

United States v. Harrison

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 12, 1988No. ACMR 8702059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

On consideration of the entire record, we hold the findings of guilty and the sentence as approved by the convening authority correct in law and fact. Trial defense counsel submitted a request for clemency to the convening authority pursuant to Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rules for Courts-Martial [hereinafter R.C.M.] 1105 and 1106. The appellant now asserts error in the failure of the staff judge advocate (SJA) to comment thereon. Notwithstanding that trial defense counsel labelled his submission, in part, as being under R.C.M. 1105, because no…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. GhiglieriU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. CoderU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. HigerdU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API