Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Finlay

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1936No. 3 Div. 168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action at law for the failure to deliver to plaintiff a carload of sugar, received by defendant as a common carrier and to be delivered to plaintiff at Brewton, Ala.

Defendant pleaded, in addition to the general issue, pleas 2, 3, and 4, to which demurrer was overruled. Issue was then taken on them without a special replication. Pleas 2 and 3 allege that the shipment was interstate, and that after it reached its destination at Brewton, there occurred an unprecedented flood, which caused the main streets in Brewton to be submerged in seventeen feet of water and the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Railroad Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Steele v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. OdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farr Co. v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. City of Birmingham v. CoeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. FinlaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Baltimore & O. R. v. Johl & BergmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Owens v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API