Legal Opinion

People v. Almo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 5, 1984No. 81-44PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti

On appeal of his convictions for murder and armed violence defendant Hubert Almo contends: (1) the trial court erred in granting the prosecution two extensions beyond the 120-day period in which they would have otherwise been required to bring defendant to trial; (2) defendant’s guilt of murder was not established beyond a reasonable doubt; (3) defendant’s armed violence conviction should be vacated because it was based on the same physical act on which his murder conviction was based; (4) the trial court erred in not permitting defense counsel to impeach a prosecution witness concerning her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. DonaldsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. YarbroughIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. ArndtIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. AlmoIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HughesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. People v. FlowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. People v. GarciaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API