Legal Opinion
Crocock v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 23, 2012No. Docket 11-1123-agPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner Anthony Gerard Crocock petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) determination that Crocock was ineligible for adjustment of status. The IJ determined that Crocock failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that he was not inadmissible under Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 212(a)(6)(C)(ii), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii), for falsely representing himself as a United States citizen for the purpose of any benefit under the INA. Crocock had checked the box on an 1-9 Employment Eligibility Form (“1-9”)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yan Chen v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Lecaj v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Ruiz v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Drax v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- David Ibragimov v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- RICHMONDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
- Richmond v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ZaziDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- BETTBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
- Ud Din v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.