Legal Opinion
Pollack v. Pollack
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 12, 1929No. 2345PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.
On January 21, 1911, Henry and Charles Pollack, brothers, entered into this contract:
“Whereas, Henry Pollack and Charles Pollack, of the County and State aforesaid, are jointly seized and possessed of certain property, both real and personal, in the City and County of Dallas, and State of Texas, and are desirous of adjusting and separating their said interests so that the title to said property may be held in severalty by the said Henry Pollack.
“Now, therefore, this agreement entered into this the twenty first day of January, 1911, between the said Henry Pollack, of the one par]t, and Charles…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Parker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Litchenstein v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Ellerd v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Mary Troutfelt Cohen, Mary Troutfelt Cohen v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Employment Advisors, Inc. v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- In Re Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958