Legal Opinion
Charles Rodman Campbell v. James Blodgett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1991No. 89-35210PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The motion of petitioner filed herein on June 10, 1991 unequivocally asserts his desire to discharge appointed counsel and to represent himself in all further proceedings in this appeal. He is entitled to do so under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). This motion is therefore GRANTED. Attorneys Gombiner and Lyon are relieved from further representation of petitioner.
Petitioner’s earlier motions to withdraw issues III, IV, and V presented in the original briefs in this appeal are DENIED. Petitioner, in his June 10, 1991 motion, notes that in light…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Charles R. Campbell v. Larry KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Campbell v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Campbell v. BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Campbell v. BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.