Legal Opinion

Tonkovitch v. Indiana Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ontonagon; Cooper, J. Case by Joseph Tonkovitch against the Indiana Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff, a native of Croatia, 31 years of age, by trade a mason, was injured on August 16, *1871911, while engaged in oiling machinery in defendant’s sawmill near its mine in Ontonagon county. Imputing his injuries to defendant’s negligence, he instituted this action to recover damages therefor in the circuit court of said county, where the trial resulted in a judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict.

Defendant was developing and operating a copper mine, called the “Indiana,” and as an adjunct built and equipped a sawmill close by, used and managed in connection with the mine. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Lunde v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Hackett v. Middlesex Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Stevens v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Driekosen v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Fonda v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Curtis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Barger v. GalazenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Bixby v. AyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API