Bassett v. Mechanics Bank
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
This is an application by the receiver of the defendant bank for advice with reference to a claim of The Arthur M. Rosenberg Company, hereinafter called the claimant, for preference in the payment to it of the proceeds of the collection of certain checks deposited by it in the bank. The facts stipulated for the purposes of this reservation include the following: The claimant is a corporation located in New Haven and on June 9th, 1932, was and had been for a long time a depositor of the defendant, The Mechanics Bank, and it had been its practice to carry on deposit a substantial balance. On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Central Trust Co v. West India Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bassett v. Merchants Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- South End Bank & Trust Co. v. NasinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Bassett v. Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Colorado Nat. Bank v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Taft v. Guardian Trust Co.City of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.