Hoover v. Jones (In re Jones)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
C. KATHRYN PRESTON, Chief Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge.
An attorney who was sanctioned pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 (“Rule 9011”) filed an .appeal asserting error by the bankruptcy court when it awarded opposing counsel attorneys’ fees pursuant to Rule 9011(c)(2). Additionally, the attorney argued that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by levying sanctions based on clearly erroneous factual findings. For the reasons stated below, the Panel holds that the bankruptcy court erred as a matter of law in awarding attorney fees as sanctions on a sua sponte…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Sonnax Industries, Inc., Debtor. Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- E. Johnston, Jr. v. Henry Hildebrand, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Jordan v. WolfDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- ATIYEHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- AmineDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- In re Gayle BagsbyBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.