Legal Opinion

Buice v. Service Mut. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1936No. 1721PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This is a workman’s compensation case. L. E. Buice was the employer, C. H. Buice the employee, and Service Mutual Insurance Company the alleged carrier. The insurance company brought suit to set aside the award of the Industrial Accident Board. Mrs*. Eunice Buice, widow of the deceased employee, filed a cross-action to recover the compensation allowable under the statute. The trial court without a jury rendered judgment in favor of the insurance company. Mrs. Buice appealed.

L. E. Buice, the employer, was engaged in the gin business, and was also engaged in farming and in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barron v. Standard Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bullard Gin & Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Barta v. Texas Reciprocal Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HoschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. Del Industrial, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Port Elevator-Brownsville, L.L.C. v. CasadosTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Mulkey v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Maryland Casualty Company v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Pacific Indemnity Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API