Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Jones
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 1943No. 79PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff was one of two competing real estate brokers authorized by defendant to secure a purchaser for his property at a price of $13,500. The other broker was Shannon & Luchs, Inc. Plaintiff, acting through an associate broker, immediately advertised the property and through that medium met the ultimate purchaser, one Joseph Drailey and his wife. He showed the property to them and after some discussion about terms they asked him to submit a verbal offer of $13,000. He refused to do so. At the trial the purchasers gave such refusal as a reason for not wanting to deal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- District of Columbia v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Battle v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Hecht Co. v. WhitefordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Taylor v. Maddux, Marshall & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- Goldsmith v. BucketCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rieffer v. HollingsworthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Rieffer v. McGuireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- First National Realty Corp. v. Blackwell Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Henderson v. PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947