Legal Opinion

Dorothea Cornelius v. U.S. Bank National Assoc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 29, 2011No. 11-12859UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Dorothea Cornelius and Ali S. Muhammad, proceeding pro se, appeal the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of their action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Cornelius and Muhammad contend that the district court either misapplied the diversity jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, or should have cured any lack of diversity by dismissing any nondiverse defendants they named. In the alternative, they argue that their complaint presents a federal question. After review, we affirm.

I

“We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Terry Gilmour v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cooper v. International Paper Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
  2. 24e Fitness LLC v. Internal Credit Systems IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  3. Diamond v. Hose O Weaver and SonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
  4. Estop v. HSBC Bank USADistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  5. Hight v. State Farm of AlabamaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API