Buffalo Smoketeria, Inc. v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.
The defendant issued its policy of insurance to plaintiff to insure the latter against robbery. The definition of robbery as included in the policy differs from the common-law and statutory description of the offense. The policy defines robbery as applied to this case as “ Robbery shall mean a felonious and forcible taking of property * * * by an overt felonious act committed in the presence of a custodian and of which he was actually cognizant.”
The facts establish that a delivery clerk of plaintiff entered certain premises known as 381^ Niagara street for the purpose of refilling an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- O'Donnell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. GlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. LambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- VAM Check Cashing v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Cummings Foods, Inc. v. Great Central InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- London v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Vam Check Cashing Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Bourg v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.