Legal Opinion

URENA v. LA FITNESS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 2021No. 5:20-cv-00964Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JASMIN URENA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-964 LA FITNESS and FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC d/b/a LA FITNESS, Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION Schmehl, J. /s/ JLS July 29, 2021 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Jasmin Urena (“Urena”) brings this suit for personal injury against Defendant Fitness International, LLC, d/b/a LA Fitness (“Defendant”). Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Urena’s response and Defendant’s Reply. For the reasons discussed more fully below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Reliance Insurance v. MoessnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Pignataro v. Port Auth. of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API