State v. French
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*597¶1
C. Johnson, J.
This case involves the issue of whether the common law fugitive disentitlement doctrine applies where a defendant absconds after conviction but before sentencing. If the doctrine applies, a defendant has waived his or her right to appeal the conviction, and we do not need to address any claimed trial court errors relating to James French’s convictions. If the doctrine does not apply, we must address the issues pertaining to both French’s convictions and sentence.
¶2 The issues include: (1) whether the trial court erred when it declined to reopen the case for the purpose of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. GracianoWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MutchWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Peña FuentesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.