Legal Opinion

State v. French

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2006No. 78569-4PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

141 P.3d 54 (2006)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

James FRENCH, Appellant.

No. 78569-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 13, 2006.

Decided August 17, 2006.

Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Attorney at Law, Seattle, for Appellant.

Kimberley Robert Farr, Michael C. Kinnie, Clark Co Pros Attys Office, Vancouver, for Respondent.

C. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 This case involves the issue of whether the common law fugitive disentitlement doctrine applies where a defendant absconds after conviction but before sentencing. If the doctrine applies, a defendant has waived his or her right to appeal the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. GracianoWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. MutchWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. Peña FuentesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. LandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API