Legal Opinion

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Better Service Sewing Machine Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 21, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS F. MURPHY, District Judge.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction against infringement of a patent on a thread tensioning device for use in sewing machines. The patent was issued in 1938, is scheduled to expire within five months and has remained unadjudicated. Defendants distribute and sell a sewing machine manufactured in Japan and embodying the alleged infringing thread tensioning device:

In support of its application, plaintiff — in addition to relying upon the pleadings and depositions of a defendant — offers two affidavits of attorneys from plaintiff’s own patent department.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  3. Grant v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Stewart Stamping Corp. v. Westchester Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zandelin v. Maxwell Bentley Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  2. Tempo Instrument, Inc. v. Logitek, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  3. Hudson Pulp & Paper Corp. v. Swanee Paper Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. Garland v. RuskinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. International Biotical Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API