Legal Opinion

Scott v. Baltimore & OR Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 14, 1945No. 8828PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act 1 and under the .Safety Appliance Acts 2 to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff, an employee of defendant, as a result of being thrown from the rear platform of a caboose attached to a train operated by the defendant near Foy’s Hill, Maryland. The District Court summarized the events with clarity as follows:

“Walter H. Scott, plaintiff, was employed as a brakeman by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a corporation, defendant. On June 2, 1943, while…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Herencia v. GuzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. L. E. Whitham Const. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Bucher v. KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  3. Southern Pac. Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API