Legal Opinion
Marchant v. Schenley Industries, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 29, 1983No. 82-3667PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
This action is before this Court on plaintiff’s motions to amend the complaint and on defendants’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. Plaintiff Howard M. Marchant alleges in his original complaint that defendants Schenley Industries, Inc., and Schenley Affiliated Brands Corp. 1 discharged him because of his age 2 in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 [ADEA], 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. 3 Plaintiff in the complaint requests liquidated damages, costs including attorney’s fees, and damages for pain and suffering.
Plaintiff, in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Henry Carl DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Andrew P. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cripps v. United Biscuit of Great BritainDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989