Legal Opinion
Michaels v. Donato
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The issue here is whether a provision in a partnership agreement between plaintiff's intestate and the defendant is valid and binding, or void because testamentary in nature. The plaintiff's intestate and the defendant were partners without a written agreement from July 1, 1941, until July 12, 1946, on which date they entered into formal articles of partnership, which provided that the partnership "shall continue for such time as may be mutually agreeable." The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McKinnon v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Murphy v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Kavanaugh v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Bellisfield v. HolcombeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Riggs National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Eisenhardt v. SchmidtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Robert Blechman and Cathy Blechman Chermak v. Estate of Bertram BlechmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Bendit v. IntaranteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Bower v. the EstaughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.