Legal Opinion
United States v. Grimaud
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 3, 1909No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On Demurrer to Indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
WEEEBORN, District Judge.
The charge against defendants is that of grazing sheep, without permission, in the Sierra Forest Reserve.
By act of Congress, approved June 4, 1897, entitled “An act making appropriations for sundry civil expenses of the government for the fiscal year 1897, and for other purposes” (Act June 4, 1897, c. 2, § 1, 30 Stat. 35 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1540]), it is provided, among other things, that:
“The Secretary of the Interior shall make provisions for the protection against destruction by fire and depredations upon the public forests and forest reservations which may…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. ConnallyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., VSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Louisville & N. R.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1910