Braham v. Honolulu Amusement Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Exceptions erom Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
PERRY, J.
This is an action instituted in the district court of Honolulu for the recovery of $150. Upon the rendition, in the circuit court on appeal, of judgment in its favor the defendant sought to have allowed as a part of its bill of costs, the amount of the attorney’s commissions authorized by R. L., §1892, to be taxed “in all actions of assumpsit.” The item was disallowed. The only question presented by the exceptions is whether this is an action of assumpsit.
The material allegations of the declaration are as follows: “That heretofore and on to wit, the 12th day of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whittenton Manuf'g Co. v. Memphis & Ohio River Packet Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Smothers v. RenanderHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rosa v. JohnstonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
- Healy-Tibbitts Construction Company v. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc., Defendant/third-Party and Bechtel, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Kamalu v. Paren, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.