Legal Opinion

In the Interest of B.I.V.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1996No. 95-0519PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application foR Writ of Error to the Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas

2Per curiam

In this paternity action, the trial court held that the child’s mother did not have standing to participate in the proceedings. The court of appeals affirmed. 897 S.W.2d 395. Because the suit affected her parental rights, we hold that the child’s mother did have standing to participate in the proceedings and we accordingly reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Pursuant to section 76.004 of the Texas Human Resources Code, the Attorney General of Texas initiated this suit by filing a Petition to…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Williams v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Precision Sheet Metal Mfg. Co. v. Yates, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Maxwell v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. The MD Anderson Cancer Center v. NovakTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. David Powers Homes, Inc. v. M. L. Rendleman Company, Inc. D/B/A Fiberglass Insulators, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. Ascendant Anesthesia Pllc v. Abazi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Potter County Attorney's Office v. Stars & Stripes Sweepstakes, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  5. Martin v. Clinical Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API