Legal Opinion

Williams v. Patton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1992No. D-0353PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOK, Justice.

This case presents the question whether section 14.41(a) of the Texas Family Code prohibits parents from settling claims for child support arrearages before the unpaid amount has been reduced to a final judgment. We hold that section 14.41(a) does prohibit such settlements. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. 796 S.W.2d 526 (1990).

Houson D. Williams and Sherry Yvonne Patton were divorced in 1974. Patton was named managing conservator of their only child, Amy Diane Williams, and Williams was ordered to pay $121 per month in child *142support. Williams…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CardwellTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Adair v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re McLemoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. McCool v. State Ex Rel. State of Tenn.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Ex Parte ColleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. In the Interest of T. M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  4. Thompto v. Coborn's Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  5. in the Interest of D.N. and D.N., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API